No AccessJournal of Urology1 Mar 1948Retrocaval Ureter: Case Report1 P.P.B. McElhinney, and John W. Dorsey P.P.B. McElhinneyP.P.B. McElhinney More articles by this author , and John W. DorseyJohn W. Dorsey More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69404-7AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1948 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByHoeltl W, Hruby W and Aharinejad S (2018) Renal Vein Anatomy and its Implications for Retroperitoneal SurgeryJournal of Urology, VOL. 143, NO. 6, (1108-1114), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1990.Psihramis K (2018) Ureteral Obstruction by a Rare Venous Anomaly: A Case ReportJournal of Urology, VOL. 138, NO. 1, (130-132), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1987.Blundon K (2018) The Treatment of Retrocaval Ureter in the Solitary KidneyJournal of Urology, VOL. 88, NO. 1, (29-32), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1962.Leberman P, Zinsser H and Milam D (2018) Retrocaval Ureter: Case Report and a New Diagnostic ApproachJournal of Urology, VOL. 68, NO. 4, (679-683), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1952.Mc Cathro A (2018) Section of the Inferior Vena Cava for Retrocaval Ureter: A New Method of TreatmentJournal of Urology, VOL. 67, NO. 4, (464-475), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1952.Duff P (2018) Retrocaval Ureter: Case ReportJournal of Urology, VOL. 63, NO. 3, (496-499), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1950.Shearer T (2018) Retrocaval Ureter: Report of a Case with Successful Plastic RepairJournal of Urology, VOL. 62, NO. 2, (152-157), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1949. Volume 59Issue 3March 1948Page: 497-500 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1948 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information P.P.B. McElhinney More articles by this author John W. Dorsey More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McElhinney et al. (1948) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: