No AccessJournal of Urology1 Nov 1946Postcaval Ureter: Report of a Surgical Case Myron H. Nourse and Hamden C. Moody Myron H. NourseMyron H. Nourse More articles by this author and Hamden C. MoodyHamden C. Moody More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69838-0AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1946 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byShepard Rowland H, Carl Bunts R and Iwano J (2018) Operative Correction of Retrocaval Ureter: A Report of Four Cases and Review of the LiteratureJournal of Urology, VOL. 83, NO. 6, (820-833), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1960.Leberman P, Zinsser H and Milam D (2018) Retrocaval Ureter: Case Report and a New Diagnostic ApproachJournal of Urology, VOL. 68, NO. 4, (679-683), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1952.Mc Cathro A (2018) Section of the Inferior Vena Cava for Retrocaval Ureter: A New Method of TreatmentJournal of Urology, VOL. 67, NO. 4, (464-475), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1952.Heslin J and Mamonas C (2018) Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Four Cases and Review of LiteratureJournal of Urology, VOL. 65, NO. 2, (212-222), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1951.Duff P (2018) Retrocaval Ureter: Case ReportJournal of Urology, VOL. 63, NO. 3, (496-499), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1950.Creevy C (2018) Recognition and Surgical Correction of Retrocaval Ureter: A Case ReportJournal of Urology, VOL. 60, NO. 1, (26-30), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1948. Volume 56Issue 5November 1946Page: 525-529 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1946 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Myron H. Nourse More articles by this author Hamden C. Moody More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nourse et al. (1946) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: