Low-altitude hyperspectral observation systems using aerial observation with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have advantages over satellite systems with respect to frequency, accuracy, and spatial resolution. Although low-cost lightweight UAVs have become available in recent years, the current price ranges of lightweight pushbroom and snapshot hyperspectral sensors remain high. For sustainable operation of UAV-mounted hyperspectral sensing, the challenge in production has been shifted from the size and weight to the cost of the lightweight hyperspectral sensors. In this paper, we develop a low-cost, lightweight whiskbroom hyperspectral imaging system. The gross weight of the sensor is 1200 g. The spectral range of the 256-band spectrometer extends from 340 to 750 nm with a 14-nm spectral resolution. The viewing angle across the flight direction is controlled by the rotation of an eight-sided polygon mirror. When the exposure time, flight altitude, flight speed, and focal length of the optical lens are 3.2 ms, 10 m, 10 m/s, and 8 mm, respectively, then the estimated values of the swath and the area coverage per second are 13.4 m and 134.1m²/s, respectively. The spatial resolution is 0.97 (m) (flight direction)×0.46 (m) (scanning direction). In preliminary close-range measurements with a 3.2-ms exposure time per area and a 1224-ms rotation period of the polygon mirror, the reflected light from 12 areas of a printed checkered color pattern in the moving direction were measured. We found that the calculated reflectance based on the measurements is spatially consistent and spectrally accurate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uto et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: