A comparative study of chemical etch rates in diluted HF or a mixture of HF, H2O, and HNO3 (P etch) was performed on conventional thermal silicon oxides (1050–1120 °C; O2 pressure ≊1.1 atm; one type with addition of 0.02% C2H3Cl3) and buried oxide layers. The latter were formed by single or multiple implanting n- and p-type (100) Si maintained at ≊600 °C with 150–200-keV O+ ions to a dose of ≊1.8×1018 cm−2, and subsequent annealing at 1250–1325 °C. The multi-implanted samples had three implants of a dose of 0.5–0.8×1018 O+ ions cm−2 each, separated by anneals but no final anneal. One of the thermal oxides was additionally irradiated with As+ ions to a dose of 1014 cm−2. Accurate mechanical thickness measurements revealed variations in etch rate between the different oxides, which provide direct evidence for a structural and/or stoichiometrical difference between thermal and buried oxides. The data indicate that the buried oxide is in a densified state as compared to thermal oxide. Also O+ and As+ irradiation-induced bond strain was clearly observed in buried oxide and thermally grown oxide, respectively. Additionally, plots of the etch rate as a function of oxide thickness reveal detailed information on structural variations of the oxide layers as a function of thickness. This is in contrast with the generally assumed homogeneity of most of these layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanheusden et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: