Key result
Upstream eptifibatide did not significantly reduce the 30-day composite of death, MI, or urgent revascularisation compared to placebo in NSTEACS patients (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.53-1.53; P=0.70).
Why the study?
Does upstream administration of eptifibatide reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularisation at 30 days in patients with NSTEACS pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel undergoing an invasive strategy?
Population
393 patients presenting with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome planned for an invasive…
Comparison
Upstream administration of eptifibatide added to… vs Double-blind placebo added to aspirin…
Design
RCT, randomly assigned, double-blind
Follow-up
30 days
Authors
Loading...
Upstream eptifibatide confers no 30-day benefit in pretreated NSTEACS; challenges routine upstream GP IIb/IIIa use before invasive strategy.
RCT (n=393)
Double-blind
randomly assigned
Yes
Does upstream administration of eptifibatide reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularisation at 30 days in patients with NSTEACS pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel undergoing an invasive strategy?
Odds Ratio: 0.93 (95% CI 0.53–1.53)
Absolute Event Rate: 15.8% vs 16.8%
p-value: p=0.70
Upstream administration of eptifibatide did not provide measurable clinical benefit over placebo in NSTEACS patients pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel undergoing an invasive strategy.
Durand et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) (n=393). eptifibatide vs. placebo was evaluated on composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularisation at 30 days (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.53, p=0.70). Upstream eptifibatide did not significantly reduce the 30-day composite of death, MI, or urgent revascularisation compared to placebo in NSTEACS patients (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.53-1.53; P=0.70).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: