Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An attempt to model the “brush” flow, studied experimentally by Tachie et al. [Phys. Fluids 16, 445 (2004)], by means of slender-body theory revealed that a successful truncation procedure requires that a few orthogonal functions be sufficient to describe the singularity distributions. In previous applications, this was easily achieved. However, when walls and/or other slender bodies are in close proximity, a large number of basis functions are likely to be needed and a loss of diagonal dominance, indeed the eventual appearance of negative diagonal coefficients, precludes a successful truncation of the infinite system of linear equations. It was also noticed, but after the proofs had been checked, that a sign error, eradicating the above difficulty, had been made in the falling needle viscometer presentation [A. M. J. Davis and H. Brenner, Phys. Fluids 13, 3086 (2001)]. Fortunately, in that flow the bounding cylinder wall is sufficiently distant from the thin needle for a convergent truncation to be quickly achieved, and the modified numerical results, listed below, exhibit fairly limited changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony M. J. Davis (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: