In this paper we describe and classify different pull production systems. The production control systems kanban and CONWIP are then analysed with respect to production rate and average W1P. We examine single product flow lines with exponential service time distributions and unlimited demand at the final buffer (saturated lines). We show that the distribution of cards (kanbans) has a significant effect on the performance of kanban systems. Different types of kanban control mechanisms show equivalent performance data, if the distribution pattern is adapted accordingly. Our research shows that the kanban system is more flexible with respect to a given objective than the CONWIP system, because in addition to the total card number the card distribution is a control parameter. Moreover for a given production rate the average WIP is lower in a kanban system than in a CONWIP system. We identify the average WIP in the interstage buffers as important parameter and describe the ‘WIP bowl phenomenon’ as result of optimum card distributions. Concluding remarks and directions for future research conclude the paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
GSTETTNER et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: