Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study investigated the accuracy of an accelerometer-based smartphone application for predicting the risk of falls in older adults.Methods Eighty community-dwelling older adults (70.05 ± 4.5 years) were assessed using an accelerometer-based smartphone application for balance assessment at baseline, which included 1) the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (MCTSIB), 2) a single-leg stance (SLST), and 3) limit of stability (LOS) test. The fall incidence during a 6-month follow-up was recorded. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to determine accuracy.Results The accuracy in predicting falls of all assessments was high (AUC = 0.78–0.99). The MCTSIB had the highest AUC (0.99) compared with the SLST (0.86) and the LOS test (0.78). The MCTSIB had a cutoff score of 8.04, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 98%.Conclusion The accelerometer-based smartphone application could predict falls in older adults with excellent accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pooranawatthanakul et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: