Comparison of methanol photochemistry at three-dimensionally (3D) networked aerogels of TiO 2 or Au–TiO 2 reveals that incorporated Au nanoparticles strongly sensitize the oxide nanoarchitecture to visible light. Methanol dissociatively adsorbs at the surfaces of TiO 2 and Au–TiO 2 aerogels under dark, high-vacuum conditions. Upon irradiation of either ultraporous material with broadband UV light under anaerobic conditions, adsorbed methoxy groups act as hole-traps and extend conduction-band and shallow-trapped electron lifetimes. A higher excited-state electron density arises for UV-irradiated TiO 2 aerogel relative to commercial nanoparticulate TiO 2, indicating that 3D networked TiO 2 more efficiently separates electron–hole pairs. Upon excitation with narrow-band visible light centered at 550 nm, long-lived excited-state electrons are evident on CH 3 OH-exposed Au–TiO 2 aerogels—but not on identically dosed TiO 2 aerogels—verifying that incorporated Au nanoparticles sensitize the networked oxide to visible light. Under aerobic conditions (20 Torr O 2 ) and broadband UV illumination, surface-sited formates accumulate as adsorbed methoxy groups oxidize, at similar rates, on Au–TiO 2 and TiO 2 aerogels. Moving to excitation wavelengths longer than ∼400 nm (i.e., the low-energy range of UV light) dramatically decreases methoxy photoconversion for methanol-saturated TiO 2 aerogel, while Au–TiO 2 aerogel remains highly active for methanol photooxidation. The wavelength dependence of formate production on Au–TiO 2 tracks the absorbance spectrum for this material, which peaks at λ = 550 nm due to resonance with the surface plasmon in the Au particles. The photooxidation rate for Au–TiO 2 aerogel at 550 nm is comparable to that for TiO 2 aerogel under broadband UV illumination, indicating efficient energy transfer from Au to TiO 2 in the 3D mesoporous nanoarchitecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panayotov et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: