Background: On average, asthma patients have lower lung function (LF) than healthy individuals and their lung function (FEV1) decline may be accelerated over time. Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis on severe asthmatics enrolled in the Belgian Severe Asthma Registry with at least 2 visits minimum 12 months apart, we compared characteristics of patients with and without LF decline (loss of post-BD FEV1 (% predicted)/year greater than zero) over time. Multiple imputation chained equation was applied to study the factors independently associated with FEV1 decline. Results: In the overall population (n=322), annual FEV1 decline was -0.24 (-5.16; 3.01) %pred/yr over a period of 22 (12-41) months. In the LF declining group (n=145, 45%), patients were slightly older and their FeNO levels were lower, whereas post-BD FEV1, post-BD FVC, and post-BD FEV1/FVC were lower and asthma less controlled in non-decliners. Twenty four percent of non-decliners were started on anti-IL5 during the study compared to 8% in decliners. The multivariable linear regression model data suggested that for every additional unit of ACQ score at baseline, there was a decrease of 3 % in decline (95% CI, -4.69 to -1.17; p=0.001) and decline was reduced by 15 % (95% CI, -20.17 to -9.29; p<0.0001) in patients in whom an anti-IL5 was started during follow-up compared to patients without anti-IL5 therapy (Fig.1), independently from other changes (in exacerbations, smoking status, ICS or OCS dose, or add-on anti-IgE). Conclusion: Targeting severe eosinophilic asthma with anti-IL5 add-on therapy could prevent LF decline. This should be confirmed in future prospective controlled studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: