Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The geometric structures and conformations of (trifluoromethyl)thioacetic acid, CF 3 C(O)SH, methyl trifluorothiolacetate, CF 3 C(O)SCH 3, and trifluorothiolacetate chloride, CF 3 C(O)SCl, were determined by gas electron diffraction and theoretical calculations (ab initio and density functional methods). In the cases of CF 3 C(O)SCH 3 and CF 3 C(O)SCl, the experimental scattering intensities are consistent only with the existence of a planar syn conformer (S CH 3 /S Cl single bonds syn with respect to the C O double bond) in the gas phase. The theoretically predicted energy differences Δ E between anti and syn forms are 4.2 kcal mol - 1 (HF/3-21G* and HF/6-31G*) for CF 3 C(O)SCH 3 and 3.2 (HF/3-21G*) or 5.6 kcal mol - 1 (HF/6-31G*) for CF 3 C(O)SCl. The conformational properties of CF 3 C(O)SH could not be determined unambiguously in the experiment. On the basis of the theoretical results (Δ E = 0.9−2.2 kcal mol - 1 ), only a syn conformer was considered in the experimental structure analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gobbato et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: