Key result
Co-administration of rivaroxaban and warfarin produced greater than additive effects on INR (mean Emax 2.79-4.15) compared to warfarin alone (1.41-1.74), without affecting pharmacokinetics.
Why the study?
Does co-administration of rivaroxaban and warfarin alter pharmacodynamics compared to warfarin alone in healthy subjects?
Does co-administration of rivaroxaban and warfarin alter pharmacodynamics compared to warfarin alone in healthy subjects?
Effect estimate: mean Emax for INR 2.79-4.15 vs 1.41-1.74
When transitioning from rivaroxaban to warfarin, INR monitoring should be performed at the trough rivaroxaban concentration to minimize the drug's effect on INR.
AIMS: The primary objective was to explore the pharmacodynamic changes during transition from rivaroxaban to warfarin in healthy subjects. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics were assessed as secondary objectives. METHODS: An open label, non-randomized, sequential two period study. In treatment period 1 (TP1), subjects received rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (5 days), followed by co-administration with a warfarin loading dose regimen of 5 or 10 mg (for the 10 mg regimen, the dose could be uptitrated to attain target international normalized ratio [INR] ≥2.0) once daily (2-4 days). When trough INR values ≥2.0 were attained, rivaroxaban was discontinued and warfarin treatment continued as monotherapy (INR 2.0-3.0). During treatment period 2, subjects received the same warfarin regimen as in TP1, but without rivaroxaban. RESULTS: During co-administration, maximum INR and prothrombin time (PT) values were higher than with rivaroxaban or warfarin monotherapy. The mean maximum effect (Emax ) for INR after co-administration was 2.79-4.15 (mean PT Emax 41.0-62.7 s), compared with 1.41-1.74 (mean PT Emax 20.1-25.2 s) for warfarin alone. However, rivaroxaban had the smallest effect on INR at trough rivaroxaban concentrations. Neither rivaroxaban nor warfarin significantly affected maximum plasma concentrations of the other drug. CONCLUSIONS: The combined pharmacodynamic effects during co-administration of rivaroxaban and warfarin were greater than additive, but the pharmacokinetics of both drugs were unaffected. Co-administration was well tolerated. When transitioning from rivaroxaban to warfarin, INR monitoring during co-administration should be performed at the trough rivaroxaban concentration to minimize the effect of rivaroxaban on INR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2014) studied Healthy subjects. Rivaroxaban and warfarin co-administration vs. Warfarin monotherapy was evaluated on Pharmacodynamic changes (maximum INR and prothrombin time) (mean Emax for INR 2.79-4.15 vs 1.41-1.74). Co-administration of rivaroxaban and warfarin produced greater than additive effects on INR (mean Emax 2.79-4.15) compared to warfarin alone (1.41-1.74), without affecting pharmacokinetics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: