Key result
Noninvasive body surface mapping detected greater atrial fibrillation organization near intracardiac drivers than elsewhere (phase singularity density 2.3 vs 1.9; P=0.02).
Why the study?
It is difficult to noninvasively phenotype AF in a way that reflects clinical end points such as response to therapy.
Does noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging accurately assess atrial fibrillation complexity compared to invasive intracardiac mapping?
Observational (n=47)
Does noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging accurately assess atrial fibrillation complexity compared to invasive intracardiac mapping?
Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging can accurately map atrial fibrillation complexity and identify drivers, correlating well with invasive mapping and ablation outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive AF driver localization; hypothesis-generating without prospective outcome data.
Background: It is difficult to noninvasively phenotype atrial fibrillation (AF) in a way that reflects clinical end points such as response to therapy. We set out to map electrical patterns of disorganization and regions of reentrant activity in AF from the body surface using electrocardiographic imaging, calibrated to panoramic intracardiac recordings and referenced to AF termination by ablation. Methods: Bi-atrial intracardiac electrograms of 47 patients with AF at ablation (30 persistent, 29 male, 63±9 years) were recorded with 64-pole basket catheters and simultaneous 57-lead body surface ECGs. Atrial epicardial electrical activity was reconstructed and organized sites were invasively and noninvasively tracked in 3-dimension using phase singularity. In a subset of 17 patients, sites of AF organization were targeted for ablation. Results: Body surface mapping showed greater AF organization near intracardially detected drivers than elsewhere, both in phase singularity density (2.3±2.1 versus 1.9±1.6; P =0.02) and number of drivers (3.2±2.3 versus 2.7±1.7; P =0.02). Complexity, defined as the number of stable AF reentrant sites, was concordant between noninvasive and invasive methods (r 2 =0.5; CC=0.71). In the subset receiving targeted ablation, AF complexity showed lower values in those in whom AF terminated than those in whom AF did not terminate ( P <0.01). Conclusions: AF complexity tracked noninvasively correlates well with organized and disorganized regions detected by panoramic intracardiac mapping and correlates with the acute outcome by ablation. This approach may assist in bedside monitoring of therapy or in improving the efficacy of ongoing ablation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrigo et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=47). Noninvasive body surface electrocardiographic imaging vs. Invasive panoramic intracardiac mapping was evaluated on Phase singularity density near intracardially detected drivers versus elsewhere (p=0.02). Noninvasive body surface mapping detected greater atrial fibrillation organization near intracardiac drivers than elsewhere (phase singularity density 2.3 vs 1.9; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: