Rearrangement of hydrogen bonds in the protonated methanol−water cluster ion H + (CH 3 OH) 4 H 2 O is analyzed. The analysis, based on ab initio calculations performed at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ//6-31+G* and MP4/ 6-311+G*//B3LYP/6-31+G* levels of computation, provides information about potential minima, transition states, and pathways for the hydrogen bond rearrangement processes. Results of the analysis are compared systematically to the experimental measurements for H + (CH 3 OH) 4 H 2 O, where two distinct charge-centered (H 3 O + and CH 3 OH 2 + ) isomers have been identified in a supersonic expansion by fragment-dependent vibrational predissociation spectroscopy (Chaudhuri et al. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 7279). Revealed by the calculations, the lowest energy pathway for the transition from an open noncyclic hydronium-centered isomer [H 3 O + (CH 3 OH) 4 ] to a linear methyloxoium-centered isomer [CH 3 OH 2 + (CH 3 OH) 3 H 2 O] involves three stable intermediates and four transition states. The transition can go through either all four-membered ring isomers or a mixture of four-membered and five-membered ring intermediates. The latter is an energetically more favorable process because of less strain involved in the five-membered ring formation. A barrier height of <2.5 kcal/mol (after zero-point energy corrections) is predicted, suggesting that rapid interconversions among different isomers can occur at room temperature for this particular cluster cation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: