With growing interest in temporary public space in Australia and internationally, this article examines the potential role of temporary public space in the lives of children. It considers whether the short-term, interactive nature of temporary public space supports or inhibits children's need for play and connection to community. The author examines the opinions of children aged 5–12 about a Melbourne based Pop-Up Park. The findings suggest that temporary public space provides children with a wide variety of socio-spatial offerings including opportunities for unstructured creative play, connection with community and relaxation. The author concludes with some thoughts about the potential role of temporary public space in the Child-Friendly Cities movement and children's participation in urban planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Natalie McGlone (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: