Key result
The occurrence of LBB area fixation beats predicted reaching the final desired intraseptal lead depth with 96.4% sensitivity and 99.0% specificity.
Why the study?
Placing the pacing lead deep enough in the septum to capture the LBB without perforation is challenging, prompting evaluation of fixation beats as a marker for reaching the target depth.
Does monitoring fixation beats predict reaching the LBB capture area in patients undergoing LBB pacing device implantation?
Observational (n=339)
No
Does monitoring fixation beats predict reaching the LBB capture area in patients undergoing LBB pacing device implantation?
Monitoring fixation beats during deep septal lead deployment is a highly sensitive and specific marker for reaching the left bundle branch capture area, potentially facilitating the procedure and increasing safety.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fixation beats may guide intraseptal lead depth in LBB pacing; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Introduction One of the challenges of left bundle branch (LBB) pacing is to place the pacing lead deep enough in the septum to obtain capture of the LBB, yet not too deep to avoid perforation. We hypothesized that the occurrence of the ectopic beats of qR/rsR’ morphology in V1 lead (fixation beats) during the lead fixation would predict that the final desired intraseptal lead depth was just reached, while the lack of fixation beats would indicate too shallow position, and need for more lead rotations. Methods Consecutive patients during LBB pacing device implantation were analyzed retrospectively and then prospectively with respect to the occurrence of the fixation beats during each episode of lead rotation. We compared the presence of fixation beats during the lead rotation event directly before the LBB capture area depth was reached versus during the events before intermediate/unsuccessful positions. Results A total of 339 patients and 1278 lead rotation events were analyzed. In the retrospective phase, the fixation beats were observed in 327/339 of final lead positions and in 9/939 of intermediate lead positions (p<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the LBB area fixation beats as a marker for reaching the LBB capture area was 96.4%, 99.0%, 97.3% and 99.0%, respectively. In the prospective, fixation-beats-guided, implantation phase the fixation beats were observed in all patients and only at the LBB capture depth. Conclusions Monitoring fixation beats during deep septal lead deployment can facilitate the procedure and possibly increase the safety of lead implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jastrzębski et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Bradyarrhythmia or heart failure requiring pacemaker or CRT (n=339). Monitoring of LBB area fixation beats vs. Intermediate or unsuccessful lead positions was evaluated on Presence of fixation beats at final LBB capture area depth versus intermediate lead positions (p=<0.001). The occurrence of LBB area fixation beats predicted reaching the final desired intraseptal lead depth with 96.4% sensitivity and 99.0% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: