Based on the anion template and chiral ligand inducting role, two series of high-nuclearity 3 d -4 f heterometallic clusters with formulas [NO 3 @Ln 6 Cu 24 (μ 3 -OH) 30 (μ 2 -OH) 3 (OAc) 6 ( R / S -L) 12 (H 2 O) 24 ](NO 3 ) 14 · x (H 2 O) (Ln = Dy, x = 30 for 1a ( R -L) and 1b ( S -L); Ln = Tb, x = 40 for 2a ( R -L) and 2b ( S -L)) and (Et 3 NH) 4 [Ln 6 Cu 12 (μ 3 -OH) 14 (μ 2 -Cl) 6 Cl 12 ( R / S -L) 12 ]Cl 2 · x (H 2 O) (Ln = Dy, x = 28 for 3a ( R -L) and 3b ( S -L); Ln = Tb, x = 33 for 4a ( R -L) and 4b ( S -L); HL = ( R / S )-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid), have been synthesized and characterized. Structural analysis reveals that the metal skeleton of compounds 1 and 2 display a Ln 6 Cu 12 octahedral inner core encapsulated by six outer Cu 2 units. In the Ln 6 Cu 12 octahedron, 6 Ln 3+ ions located at the six vertices and 12 inner Cu 2+ ions located at the 12 edges of octahedron, and one NO 3 – locates in the center of the octahedron. The metal core of compounds 3 and 4 can be viewed as a Ln 6 octahedron encapsulated by six Cu 2 units. It is interesting that the different inorganic anions involved in the reaction result in the difference in the structures of 1 to 2 and 3 to 4 . Circular dichroism spectra of 1 – 4 display obvious mirror symmetry effect at 600–800 nm of d–d transition of Cu 2+, suggesting that the chirality transferred from chiral R - and S -ligand to Cu 2+ ions in this system. Notably, the CD peak at the Cu 2+ d–d transition position of Ln 6 Cu 12 cluster is obviously blue-shifted compared with that of Ln 6 Cu 24 due to the different coordinated environments of Cu 2+ . Magnetic studies indicate that 1a and 2a show weak ferromagnetic interactions, while 3a and 4a display antiferromagnetic interactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: