Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 26, 2014The British Journal of PsychiatryOpen Access

Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in depression: comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments with two depression-specific outcome measures

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CMCathrine MihalopoulosGCGang ChenAIAngelo Iezzi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Mihalopoulos et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a89989fc2b067567ebd4f82https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.136036
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparing the Incomparable? A Systematic Review of Competing Techniques for Converting Descriptive Measures of Health Status into QALY-Weights2007 · 154 citations
  2. 2Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses.1998 · 56 citations
  3. 3Is the EQ–5D fit for purpose in mental health?2010 · 167 citations
  4. 4Can we derive an 'exchange rate' between descriptive and preference-based outcome measures for stroke? Results from the transfer to utility (TTU) technique2009 · 29 citations