Why the study?
Does three- and four-dimensional ultrasonography using spatiotemporal image correlation improve the assessment of the fetal heart compared to conventional two-dimensional echocardiography?
Does three- and four-dimensional ultrasonography using spatiotemporal image correlation improve the assessment of the fetal heart compared to conventional two-dimensional echocardiography?
3D and 4D ultrasonography with spatiotemporal image correlation enhances fetal heart assessment by allowing offline analysis, direct structural measurements, and functional calculations, supplementing standard 2D echocardiography.
The objective of this review was to demonstrate the main tools of three- and four-dimensional ultrasonography, using the spatiotemporal image correlation software and its respective applications for assessing the fetal heart and its vascular connections, along with its potential contribution towards screening for congenital heart diseases. Today, conventional, two-dimensional, echocardiography continues to be the gold standard for diagnosing congenital heart diseases. However, recent studies have demonstrated that spatiotemporal image correlation offers some advantages that boost two-dimensional accuracy in detecting congenital heart diseases, given that the fetal heart assessment can be completed in the absence of the patient (offline) and be discussed by different examiners. Additionally, data volumes can be sent for analysis in reference centers via internet links. Spatiotemporal image correlation also enables direct measurement of heart structures in rendering mode, such as the interventricular septum and the annulus of the atrioventricular valves. Furthermore, it enables assessment of cardiac function when used in association with the virtual organ computer-aided analysis software, thus making it possible to calculate the total systolic function, ejection fraction, and cardiac output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Júnior et al. (2014) conducted a review in congenital heart diseases. three- and four-dimensional ultrasonography vs. conventional, two-dimensional echocardiography was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: