Key result
Mean abdominal-pelvic blood flow determined by Doppler ultrasound was 2078 +/- 495 ml/min and showed a significant positive linear relationship with body surface area and body weight (p < 0.05).
Why the study?
Can pulsed Doppler ultrasound reliably measure arterial blood flow of all abdominal-pelvic organs in healthy males?
Observational (n=40)
Can pulsed Doppler ultrasound reliably measure arterial blood flow of all abdominal-pelvic organs in healthy males?
p-value: p=<0.05
Pulsed Doppler ultrasound of three conduit arteries provides a valid measurement of physiological blood flow to multiple abdominal-pelvic organ systems.
Supports Doppler ultrasound for abdominal-pelvic flow in healthy males; leaves open reliability and clinical utility pending prospective validation.
The pulsed Doppler method theoretically enables human arterial blood flow (BF) to be determined in all of the abdominal-pelvic organs (BF(AP)) by subtracting the bilateral proximal femoral arterial BF from the upper abdominal aorta BF above the coeliac trunk. Evaluation of BF(AP) is a potentially useful indicator of exercise or food intake related flow distribution to organs; however, there is a lack of information regarding the physiological significance of BF(AP), and the measurements are yet to be validated. The aims of the present study are to examine the range in BF(AP) among subjects, monitor physiological day-to-day variability in BF(AP) over three different days and then determine whether mean BF(AP) (averaged over the three different measurement days) is related to body surface area (BSA). Forty healthy males (19-39 years) with a wide range of body weights (51-89 kg) were evaluated in a sitting position following a 12 h fast. The above-mentioned three conduit arteries were measured to determine BF(AP) using pulsed Doppler with spectral analysis. The mean BF(AP) was 2078 +/- 495 ml min(-1) (mean +/- SD) (range, 1153-3285 ml min(-1)), which is in agreement with a previous study that measured the sum of BF in the major part of the coeliac, mesenteric and renal arteries. The physiological day-to-day variability (mean coefficient of variation) was 14.5 +/- 10.0%. Significant (p < 0.05) positive linear relationships were observed between BF(AP) and BSA as well as body weight, which is in good agreement with the results of a previous study. The present data suggest that BF(AP) determined by three-conduit arterial hemodynamics may be a valid measurement that encompasses physiologic flow to multiple abdominal-pelvic organ systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osada et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=40). Doppler ultrasound measurement of abdominal-pelvic blood flow was evaluated on Mean abdominal-pelvic blood flow (BF(AP)) and its relationship with body surface area and body weight (p=<0.05). Mean abdominal-pelvic blood flow determined by Doppler ultrasound was 2078 +/- 495 ml/min and showed a significant positive linear relationship with body surface area and body weight (p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: