Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rosacea is a chronic skin disease of adults characterized by facial flushing, erythema, telangiectasia, and inflammatory papules and pustules. The open-label use of the combination of topical sodium sufacetamide (10%) and sulfur (5%) has been reported to be helpful in controlling the disorder but observations from well-controlled trials are lacking. This vehicle-controlled double-blind study was performed to determine the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of this combination in treating rosacea. A total of 103 patients with moderate to severe facial erythema and at least five papules and/or pustules bilaterally were enrolled, and 94 completed the study. Treatment was randomly assigned. Active or vehicle lotion was applied twice daily for the duration of the 8-week trial. Efficacy was evaluated by counting inflammatory lesions, assessing the severity of facial erythema, and by both a physician's and a subject's global evaluation. A product satisfaction questionnaire was also completed by all patients. By week 4 there was significant improvement in all efficacy parameters favoring treatment with active lotion over vehicle lotion and maximum benefit was seen at week 8. Inflammatory lesions had decreased by 65 ± 5.3% (mean ± SEM) in the active treatment group compared with 44 ± 5.0% in the vehicle treatment group by week 4 (P=0.002), and by 78 ± 4.5% vs 36 ± 8.9%, respectively, by week 8 (P<0.001). Facial erythema had decreased by week 4 in 66% of the patients in the active treatment group compared with 33% in the vehicle group (P=0.005) and by week 8 83% vs 31% of each group, respectively, had improved (P<0.001). The most common adverse experiences were application site reactions which decreased in frequency over time. This formulation of topical sodium sulfacetamide (10%) and sulfur (5%) lotion was effective in reducing the inflammatory lesions and erythema of rosacea and was well tolerated and accepted by the patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dn et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: