Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the applied value of F-fluoro-2-dexoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and MRI in detecting lymph-node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 87 early-stage cervical cancer patients evaluated with PET/CT and pelvic MRI before surgery. Histopathological evaluation of lymph nodes served as the diagnostic standard. F-FDG PET/CT and MRI images were analyzed and correlated with histopathological findings. RESULTS: The overall node-based sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET/CT were 91% (61/67), 78.2% (61/78), 99.4% (1079/1085), and 98% (1140/1163), respectively, which were higher than the corresponding values of MRI, at 37.3% (25/67), 61% (25/41), 96.3% (1080/1122), and 95% (1105/1163) (P<0.034). The difference in diagnostic efficacy for identifying node-based metastases between PET/CT and MRI was significant (PET/CT vs. MRI, 0.719 vs. 0.587, P=0.017). Meanwhile, the overall patient-based sensitivity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT were 100% (34/34), 87.2% (34/39), 100% (48/48), and 94.3% (82/87), respectively, whereas the corresponding MRI values were 44% (15/34), 65% (15/23),74% (45/61), and 69% (60/87) (P<0.04). The difference in diagnostic efficacy for identifying patient-based metastases between PET/CT and MRI was significant (PET/CT vs. MRI, 0.974 vs. 0.705, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: PET/CT has been proven to be valuable in detecting lymph-node metastases. Compared with MRI, PET/CT has higher sensitivity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer for detecting lymphatic metastases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: