This discourse analytic study examines teases among diverse staff to show how social justice commitments play out in actual meetings in a homeless advocacy organization. Before considering specific teases, I discuss the relationship between informality and teasing in this workplace setting. The analysis then focuses on 13 examples which show how social justice commitments get challenged in everyday practice: (1) The egalitarian commitment for all to voice opinions comes into tension with avoiding time-consuming meetings; (2) volunteering to share work can come into tension with doing one's fair share; (3) the more egalitarian work practice where staff take responsibility for setting their own work deadlines can, in practice, come in tension with the more hierarchical director's setting a deadline for them; (4) staff differ in job positions as well as economic and educational backgrounds and whether or not they have experienced homelessness. Teases provide a playful reminder of their egalitarian relationships, that despite staff differences no one is better than anyone else; and (5) race matters so much that in talk a simple reference to color—black or white anything—can provide an opportunity to celebrate blackness in this organization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janet Yedes (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: