Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-temperature measurements of the normal- and superconducting-state thermal conductivities were made on ten tin specimens, one of which was pure (99.996%) and nine of which were lightly doped (up to 1 at.%) with mercury, lead, or bismuth. The ratios KˢKⁿ of the superconducting- to normal-state thermal conductivity are used to analyze the data. The normal-state thermal conductivity is assumed to consist of a fractionally small lattice component Kgⁿ consistent with the "universal-curve" formalism of Lindenfeld and Pennebaker, added to a much larger electronic component of the Wiedemann-Franz type. The super-conducting lattice thermal conductivity Kgˢ is assumed to be simply related to Kgⁿ in a manner roughly independent of impurity concentration. Proceeding in this manner, it is shown that the variation of KˢKⁿ with changing electronic mean free path is consistent with a normal-state lattice conductivity having a temperature dependence similar to that observed by other investigators on other alloy systems. Furthermore, if one quantitatively adopts the "universal-curve" formalism, it is seen that the analysis yields a temperature-dependent ratio of lattice conductivities, KgˢKgⁿ which is consistent with the theory of Bardeen, Rickayzen, and Tewordt. The thermal conductivities of the pure and the three lowest impurity samples are mostly electronic, and thus it is possible to compare their KˢKⁿ ratio with the theoretical KₑˢKₑⁿ ratio of Kadanoff and Martin, calculated for an isotropic gap. The pure-sample data fit the theory with a value of 3.3kBTc for the superconducting energy gap. However, a value of 3.9kBTc is found for the gap for the three impure samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pearson et al. (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: