Although fetal growth is generally considered to be independent of pituitary growth hormone (GH), it is possible that pituitary GH plays a modulatory role in organ development or that a GH-like substance of non pituitary origin may influence fetal growth through the GH receptor. Accordingly, we have used immunohisto-chemisty, northern blot analysis, the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and solution hybridization to study the ontogeny of the GH receptor/binding protein (BP) from the 12-day-old embryo (E12) to the E18 rat fetus. GH receptor/BP immunoreactivity was observed in all major organ systems of the E18 rat fetus and was not preferentially associated with any germ layer derivative. A general increase in GH receptor/BP immunoreactivity was evident from E12 to E18, with a marked increase occurring between E16 and E18. Hemangioblastic tissue was, however, strongly or intensely immunoreactive at all stages of development, as was the placenta. Most noteworthy of the other tissues expressing GH receptor/BP immunoreactivity by day 18 were skeletal and smooth muscle, chondroprogenitor cells, epithelial lining cells, neuronal ganglia, ependymal cells and the adrenal cortex. In the placenta, the most prominent immunoreactivity was associated with decidual cells. Total RNA was isolated from E12 to E18 rat fetuses and adult rat liver. Northern hybridization with a 35S-labelled rat GH receptor cRNA probe revealed that 3.9 kb and 1.2 kb transcripts complementary to the rat GH receptor ribopobe are present from at least E16. The existence of GH receptor mRNA at E12 and E14 was demonstrated by the polymerase chain reaction. Solution hybridization analysis demonstrated an exponential increase in the total embryonic GH receptor/BP mRNA during fetal development. However even by E18 levels were only 8% those of adult liver. In conclusion, we have demonstrated the presence and defined the ontogeny of the GH receptor/BP in the rat foetus from mid gestation. These results, when combined with earlier studies of GH action on fetal tissues suggest a réévaluation of the role of GH in prenatal growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García-Aragón et al. (1992) studied this question.