The thiiranium hexachloroantimonates 1a, 3, and 5a − c and the thiirenium hexachloroantimonates 6a − c and 7a with exocyclic S -R substituent (R = Me, Et, i- Pr) react at sulfur with dialkyl disulfides R‘ ‘SSR‘ ‘ (R‘ ‘ = Me, Et and R‘ ‘ ≠ R) in CD 2 Cl 2 at 25 °C to give S -R‘ ‘ substituted ions. The reaction rates are affected by the steric hindrance of the substituents at sulfur and at ring carbons. t -2, t -3-Di- tert -butyl- r -1-methylthiiranium hexachloroantimonate ( 2 ) does not react, and the t -2- tert -butyl- c -3-phenyl- r -1-methylthiiranium ( 5a ) reacts about 100 times faster than the c -2, t -3-di- tert -butyl- r -1-methylthiiranium ion ( 1a ). The analysis of the kinetic data suggests that the sulfonium sulfur undergoes attack by the disulfide in the ring plane from a direction that is parallel to the C−C ring bond. This is also the direction which ensures the maximum overlap with the LUMO of thiiranium or thiirenium ions (determined at the RHF/3-21G*//RHF/3-21G* level). The combined consideration of the approach modality and of the maximum orbital overlap suggests that the nucleophilic substitution at sulfonium sulfur is not an S N 2-like reaction but occurs via an intermediate with episulfurane-like structure. The principle of microscopic reversibility will dictate that this is also the first intermediate in the electrophilic sulfenylation of unsaturated C−C bonds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fachini et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: