Why the study?
It was unclear whether a new-generation 320-slice CT device with Forward-projected Model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST) improves diagnostic performance for detecting abnormal late enhancement in left ventricular myocardium.
Does second-generation 320-slice CT with FIRST improve the diagnostic performance for detecting late enhancement in left ventricular myocardium compared to first-generation 320-slice CT?
Does second-generation 320-slice CT with FIRST improve the diagnostic performance for detecting late enhancement in left ventricular myocardium compared to first-generation 320-slice CT?
Second-generation 320-slice CT with FIRST significantly improves the sensitivity and image quality for detecting late enhancement in the left ventricular myocardium while reducing radiation dose compared to older generation CT.
May enhance late enhancement detection in this cohort; leaves open effects on management or outcomes.
Objective Forward-projected Model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST) is a novel reconstruction method. We investigated the improvement in the diagnostic performance for the detection of abnormal late enhancement (LE) in left ventricular myocardium (LVM) using a new-generation 320-slice computed tomography (CT) device with FIRST. Methods This is a retrospective study that included 100 adult patients who underwent cardiac CT including a late phase scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 3 months. The first 50 consecutive patients (first-generation group) underwent first-generation 320-slice CT without FIRST, and the next 50 consecutive patients (second-generation group) underwent second-generation 320-slice CT with FIRST. We compared the diagnostic performance of the first- and second-generation 320-slice CT with FIRST with MRI as a reference standard to detect LE in LVM. Results In the patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of detection of LE on CT were 79%, 90%, 92%, 76%, and 84%, respectively, in the first-generation group and 97%, 84%, 91%, 94%, and 92%, respectively, in the second-generation group. The sensitivity was significantly higher in the second-generation group than in the first-generation group (p=0.049). In the segment-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of detection of LE on CT were 69%, 96%, 83%, 92%, and 90%, respectively, in the first-generation group and 87%, 94%, 84%, 95%, and 92%, respectively, in the second-generation group. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were significantly higher in the second-generation group than in the first-generation group (p<0.001 and p=0.016). The contrast-noise ratio was significantly higher in the second-generation group than in the first-generation group (5.6±1.7 vs. 2.8±1.1, p<0.001), and the radiation dose for the assessment of LE on CT was significantly higher in the first-generation group than in the second-generation group (4.7±2.7 mSv vs. 2.3±0.1 mSv, p<0.001). Conclusion The diagnostic performance for the detection of LE in LVM significantly improved with the use of second-generation 320-slice CT and FIRST.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takaoka et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: