Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Highlights the importance of modifying surgical morbidity and mortality meetings to encourage open discussion of errors and improve patient safety.
The recognition of the inevitability of errors in fields such as aviation, nuclear technology, electronics and pharmaceutical industries has been followed by impressive quality improvement and error reduction since the turn of the last century.1,2 In surgery, the incorporation of this concept has been slow despite the increased attention of the public, media and professional groups. These groups believe that encouraging the reporting and study of errors will lead to system improvements and a safer healthcare.1,3 Openness to discussion and study of errors with an understanding that errors must be accepted as evidence of systems flaws and not character flaws has consistently been central to their message.1-3
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: