OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the resin-dentin interface of sound and eroded dentin using universal and total-etch adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty caries-free extracted human premolars were collected, and the occlusal surfaces were ground by using slow speed diamond disc with copious water supply until a flat superficial dentin was exposed. The test group underwent erosive cycle (n = 20), and another group (n = 20) was reserved for control group. Erosive protocol consisted of immersion in 1.23% citric acid for 1 minute every 12 hours and stored in artificial saliva. Both the control and eroded teeth were further subdivided (n = 10) for composite restoration by using either self-etch or total-etch systems. Then the tooth samples were sectioned longitudinally and observed under confocal laser scanning microscope at ×10 magnification to evaluate resin tag length and hybrid layer thickness. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data obtained were analyzed by using independent t-test. RESULTS: The highest mean value of the resin tag length and thickness of hybrid layer was observed with total-etch system in sound dentin group compared with other groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The resin-dentin interface of sound dentin was found to be better than eroded dentin by using total-etch system. The resin-dentin interface of eroded dentin was superior to sound dentin by using self-etch adhesive system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanniappan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: