The dielectric constant and its temperature and pressure dependence have been measured on RbCl, RbBr and CsCl, CsBr, CsI. The values for ε, ${{10}⁵{({{∂}{ε}}{{∂}T})}ₚ}{({ε}{-}1)({ε}{-}2){(^∘{}K)}^{{-}1}}$ and ${{10}⁷{({{∂}{ε}}{{∂}p})}T}{({ε}{-}1)({ε}+2)}$ ${(kg/{cm}²)}^{{-}1}$ are 5.0, 5.5, -19.4; 4.9, 5.2, -23.5; 7.2, 2.5, -16.3; 6.5, 2.8, -19.1; and 5.7, 3.2, -23.2, respectively. The temperature dependence for compounds with the CsCl structure thus is smaller than for compounds with the NaCl structure. The existence of a structural effect has been verified by measuring RbBr at 4600 kg/cm² in both structures. The corresponding quantities as given above are in the NaCl structure 4.65, 4.9, -21 and in the CsCl structure 6.5, 2.1, -17. Analysis of the results shows that the difference is due to a difference in the temperature dependence of the infrared polarizability at constant volume. The theory shows that, whereas there is no difference in the negative contribution from fourth-order anharmonic terms in the potential energy to this temperature dependence of the polarizability in both structures, the positive influence of third-order terms increases as the number of nearest neighbors decreases. By using a simple ionic model a semiquantitative agreement between theory and experiment was obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Havinga et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: