This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The potential of airborne hyperspectral remote sensing in crop monitoring and estimation of various biophysicalparameters was examined in this study. A field experiment, consisting of four weed control strategies (no weed control,broadleaf control, grass control, and full weed control) as the main plot effect, factorially combined with three nitrogen (N)fertilization rates (60, 120, and 250 N kg ha1), and replicated four times, was conducted. Hyperspectral data in 72 narrowwavebands (409 to 947 nm) from a Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI) sensor were acquired 30 days afterplanting, at tasseling, and at the fully mature stage. In addition, measurements were made concurrently on various cropphysiological parameters: leaf greenness (SPAD readings), leaf area index (LAI), plant height, leaf nitrogen content, leafchlorophyll content, and associated factors such as soil moisture. Regression models were generated to estimate cropbiophysical parameters and yield, in terms of reflectance at one or more wavebands, using the maximum r2 improvementcriterion. The models that best represented the data had five wavebands as independent variables. Coefficients ofdetermination (r2) were generally greater than 0.9, when based on the spectral data taken at the tasseling stage. Results wereimproved when normalized difference vegetation indices (NDVI) were used rather than the fivewaveband reflectance values.The wavebands at 701 nm and 839 nm were the most prevalent in the NDVIbased models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goel et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: