Why the study?
Biobanks enable cutting-edge omics research, and twin research methods clarify how genetics and environmental factors contribute to health outcomes, addressing gaps in health and genetics research.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
Twins and a comparative sample of singletons in Sri Lanka
Comparison
Twins vs comparative sample of singletons
Design
Cohort profile and biobank establishment
Enables twin-based omics research in South Asia; leaves open cardiovascular applications pending longitudinal validation.
Introduction: Biobanks are a valuable resource for creating advancements in science through cutting-edge omics research. Twin research methods allow us to understand the degree to which genetics and environmental factors contribute to health outcomes. Methods: The Sri Lankan Twin Registry biobank (SLTR-b) was established in 2015 as part of Colombo Twin and Singleton Follow-up Study. Venous blood and urine were collected from twins and comparative sample of singletons for clinical investigations and biobanking. Results: The SLTR-b currently houses 3369 DNA and serum samples. Biobank specimens are linked to longitudinal questionnaire data, clinical investigations, anthropometric measurements, and other data. Discussion: The SLTR-b aims to address gaps in health and genetics research. It will provide opportunities for academic collaborations, local and international, and capacity building of future research leaders in twin and omics research. This paper provides a cohort profile of the SLTR-b and its linked data, and an overview of the strategies used for biobanking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayaweera et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: