Background Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) are front-line therapy for mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Poor ECOG performance status (PS) is widely recognized as a negative prognostic factor, often leading physicians to avoid treatment. We aimed to assess the effect of ECOG PS on patient outcomes in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC receiving ICBs. Methods This is an international multicenter retrospective cohort study of ICBs-naïve dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients who received ICBs between 2014–2024. Exposure variables included best treatment response and patient characteristics including line of treatment, RAS/BRAF status, single-agent versus doublet ICBs, and metastatic sites. The main outcome was overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze the association of best treatment response with overall survival according to ECOG PS of 2-3 and 0-1. Results The study cohort included 51 dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients with ECOG PS of 2-3 and 633 patients with ECOC PS of 0-1 that were treated with ICBs. Median follow-up time was 35.3 months (IQR 23.9 – 54.9) and 49.9 months (IQR 46.7-53.8), respectively. For patients with ECOG PS of 2-3 ORR and DCR rates were 37.3% and 60.8%. Median overall survival (mOS) was 14.4 months - not reached for those who achieved CR/PR and 1.7 months for those whose best response was PD. For patients with ECOG PS of 0-1, mOS was not reached, and ORR was 60.0%. Conclusions Patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC and ECOG PS 2-3 derive durable benefit from ICBs, mainly among those who achieved CR/PR, and should therfore be considered candidates for this therapy. Micro Abstract Patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC and ECOG PS 2-3 treated with ICBs achieved an ORR of 37%. For those who achieved CR/PR, median overall survival was not reached. Therefore, dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients with poor PS can derive meaningful clinical benefit from ICBs and should be considered candidates for this therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margalit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: