Why the study?
Does minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy improve outcomes compared to traditional surgery in selected patients?
Does minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy improve outcomes compared to traditional surgery in selected patients?
MIVAT is a safe and valid alternative to traditional thyroid surgery, offering advantages in pain reduction, cosmetics, and patient satisfaction when performed by trained surgeons.
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is known and used worldwide, it combines the advantages associated with endoscopic magnification with those due with traditional surgery. In selected patients, it should be considered a safe and valid alternative. Indeed, a lot of comparative studies have demonstrated the advantages of MIVAT in terms of low rate of complications, reduced postoperative pain, improved cosmetic results and higher patient satisfaction over traditional surgery. Anyway, for obtaining the best results, with similar or even less complication rate than traditional surgery, surgeons should be well trained, acquired confidence with a smaller surgical incision and with the use of endoscopic instruments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lombardi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: