This paper presents the second part of the work on robust partial least squares (RPLS) regression and develops a new RPLS algorithm based on the concept laid out in Part I. The paper also contrasts the new algorithm with existing work using two simulation examples. This comparison highlights (i) the impact of the flaws in existing RPLS work and (ii) the compromised sensitivity resulting from introducing simplifications to the determination of the Stahel–Donoho estimator (SDE). The paper finally presents an evaluation of the computational complexity of RPLS algorithms and examines the impact of the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) upon the sensitivity of detecting outliers. The third part of this work will examine practical aspects of RPLS applications based on the analysis of experimental data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krüger et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: