Oxidative addition of perfluorobenzyl iodide to TpRh(C2H4)2 [Tp = tris(pyrazolyl)borate] affords TpRh(CF2C6F5)(C2H4)I, from which the ethylene ligand can be displaced by CO to afford TpRh(CF2C6F5)(CO)I. Similar reaction of perfluorobenzyl iodide with TpIr(CO)2 or Tp*M(CO)2 [Tp* = tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borate; M = Rh, Ir] affords Tp*M(CF2C6F5)(CO)I. Displacement of CO from the carbonyl complexes using PMe3 is not clean and yields a mixture of compounds. However, displacement of ethylene from TpRh(CF2C6F5)(C2H4)I using PMe3 cleanly affords TpRh(CF2C6F5)(PMe3)I. Similar oxidative addition reactions of perfluoro-n-propyl iodide afford TpIr(C3F7)(CO)I, TpRh(C3F7)(CO)I, Tp*Rh(C3F7)(CO)I, Tp*Rh(C3F7)(PMe3)I, and TpM(C3F7)(C2H4)I [M = Rh, Ir]. While displacement of ethylene from TpRh(C3F7)(C2H4)I by PMe3, to give TpRh(C3F7)(PMe3)I is facile, the corresponding reaction of the iridium analogue affords the salt [TpM(C3F7)(C2H4)(PMe3)]+I−. Ethylene rotation barriers and Co stretching frequencies in these compounds are discussed. The molecular structures of TpIr(CF2C6F5)(CO)I, TpRh(CF2C6F5)(PMe3)I, and TpRh(C3F7)(PMe3)I have been determined, and are also discussed in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowden et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: