Various procedures have been reported for successful in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization (IVM/IVF) of bovine follicular oocytes. Direct comparisons of these different recommended procedures have been rare. In this research, involving a total of 5,128 oocytes, a series of experiments were conducted to compare oocyte maturation, fertilization, and development in vitro with 2 maturation systems (with or without added hormones) and 3 types of sperm treatment procedures. Oocytes were collected from ovarian antral follicles (2–7 mm in diameter) within 3 hr after slaughter of cows or heifers. Those with intact or at least 4 layers of cumulus cells were selected for IVM/IVF. Oocytes were incubated for 22 hr in either Medium 199 with 7.5% fetal calf serum (M199 + FCS) alone or M199 + FCS with added hormones (M199 + FCS + H; oFSH 0.5 μg/ml, oLH 5.0 μg/ml, and E2 1.0 μg/ml) at 39°C in 5% CO2 and 95% air. For IVF, frozen‐thawed sperm were treated with either 0.1 μM calcium ionophore A23187 (A23187) for 1 min, or 10 or 100 μg/ml heparin (H10 or H100) for 15 min. Our results demonstrated the following: (1) both M199 + FCS and M199 + FCS + H supported maturation development to the metaphase II stage (90–95%, P > 0.05); (2) when oocytes were matured in M199 + FCS without added hormones, A23187 sperm treatment was superior to H10 or H100 treatment for fertilization and blastocyst development of the inseminated oocytes (P < 0.05); (3) when oocytes were matured in M199 + FCS + H, A23187 treated sperm again produced a higher fertilization rate than the H10 group (P < 0.05), but the development to the blastocyst stage was similar among all 3 sperm treatment groups (P > 0.05); (4) direct comparison of the 2 maturation systems with A23187 treated sperm resulted in no difference in all criteria measured; however, (5) when compared retrospectively, beneficial effects of added hormones are evident for blastocyst development (but not for fertilization) when sperm were treated with heparin procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: