Why the study?
Does the C-strain vaccine rapidly protect pigs against clinical disease and transmission of diverse classical swine fever virus strains when administered shortly before challenge?
Does the C-strain vaccine rapidly protect pigs against clinical disease and transmission of diverse classical swine fever virus strains when administered shortly before challenge?
The C-strain vaccine induces remarkably rapid protection against diverse classical swine fever virus strains, supporting its potential use in emergency vaccination strategies to control outbreaks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rapid protection in this pig model supports emergency CSF vaccination concepts; leaves open field efficacy and strain diversity.
Pre-emptive culling is becoming increasingly questioned as a means of controlling animal diseases, including classical swine fever (CSF). This has prompted discussions on the use of emergency vaccination to control future CSF outbreaks in domestic pigs. Despite a long history of safe use in endemic areas, there is a paucity of data on aspects important to emergency strategies, such as how rapidly CSFV vaccines would protect against transmission, and if this protection is equivalent for all viral genotypes, including highly divergent genotype 3 strains. To evaluate these questions, pigs were vaccinated with the Riemser® C-strain vaccine at 1, 3 and 5 days prior to challenge with genotype 2.1 and 3.3 challenge strains. The vaccine provided equivalent protection against clinical disease caused by for the two challenge strains and, as expected, protection was complete at 5 days post-vaccination. Substantial protection was achieved after 3 days, which was sufficient to prevent transmission of the 3.3 strain to animals in direct contact. Even by one day post-vaccination approximately half the animals were partially protected, and were able to control the infection, indicating that a reduction of the infectious potential is achieved very rapidly after vaccination. There was a close temporal correlation between T cell IFN-γ responses and protection. Interestingly, compared to responses of animals challenged 5 days after vaccination, challenge of animals 3 or 1 days post-vaccination resulted in impaired vaccine-induced T cell responses. This, together with the failure to detect a T cell IFN-γ response in unprotected and unvaccinated animals, indicates that virulent CSFV can inhibit the potent antiviral host defences primed by C-strain in the early period post vaccination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: