Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supplement 17 of the British Journal of Radiology is a survey of central-axis depth doses for radiotherapy machines, patterned largely on BJR Supplement 11 published some 11 years earlier. Inspection of the high-energy X-ray depth doses for a 10 x 10 cm field at an SSD of 100 cm disclosed large differences between the two sets of data, especially for qualities above 8 MV. For example, a depth dose of 80% at 10 cm is rated at about 19 MV according to BJR Supplement 11, and 23 MV according to BJR Supplement 17. It was found that the Supplement 17 depth-dose data above 8 MV were erratic, but that the Supplement 11 data could be represented by an analytical expression, providing a unique means of assigning MV quality. It was also found that the dose-weighted average energy of the filtered beam plotted smoothly against depth dose. For dosimetric purposes, it is suggested that this parameter be used as a true measure of beam quality, removing the discrepancies introduced by the use of nominal MV for this purpose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip D. LaRiviere (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: