Why the study?
Experimental evidence regarding the proarrhythmic risk potential of the atrial-selective sodium channel blocker acehytisine was limited.
In a guinea-pig model, acehytisine demonstrated potent atrial inhibition with a lower proarrhythmic risk compared to bepridil, highlighting its potential for treating paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform acehytisine safety screening in animals; leaves open human proarrhythmic risk.
Experimental evidence regarding the risk of proarrhythmic potential of acehytisine is limited. We assessed its electropharmacological effect together with proarrhythmic potential at intravenous doses of 4 and 10 mg/kg (n = 6) using isoflurane-anesthetized guinea pigs in comparison with that of bepridil at 1 and 3 mg/kg, intravenously (n = 6). Acehytisine at therapeutic dose (4 mg/kg) decreased the heart rate, prolonged P wave duration, QRS width, QT interval, QTc, MAP 90(sinus) , MAP 90(CL300) and MAP 90(CL250). At supratherapeutic dose (10 mg/kg), it prolonged the PR interval besides enhancing the changes induced by the therapeutic dose. Quantitative assessment showed that peak changes in P wave duration by acehytisine at 10 mg/kg were 1.7 times longer than bepridil, and in MAP 90(sinus) , MAP 90(CL300) and MAP 90(CL250) by acehytisine were 1.9, 1.5 and 1.5 times shorter than bepridil, respectively. Importantly, qualitative assessment indicated that bepridil increased beat-to-beat variability and J-T peak c in a dose-related manner, confirming a higher proarrhythmic risk, whereas such dose-related responses were not observed in acehytisine, suggesting a lower proarrhythmic risk. These results suggest that acehytisine exhibits favorable pharmacological characters, i.e. potent atrial inhibition and lower proarrhythmic toxicity compared with bepridil, being a promising candidate for the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: