Why the study?
LRG1 contributes to aberrant neovascularization in many diseases but is not involved in developmental angiogenesis, prompting investigation into its vasculopathic properties on developing retinal blood vessels.
Does exogenous LRG1 alter pericyte phenotype and compromise vascular maturation in developing mouse retinae?
Does exogenous LRG1 alter pericyte phenotype and compromise vascular maturation in developing mouse retinae?
Exogenous LRG1 interferes with the maturation of developing retinal vessels, driving them towards a dysfunctional phenotype and highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target in pathogenic angiogenesis.
Exogenous LRG1 impairs retinal vascular maturation in mice; hypothesis-generating for LRG1 targeting in human angiogenesis.
Upregulation of leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein-1 (LRG1) contributes to aberrant neovascularization in many different diseases. In contrast, LRG1 is not involved in developmental angiogenesis. Here, we investigated the vasculopathic properties of LRG1 by examining its effect on developing retinal blood vessels. By injecting recombinant protein or an expression vector into the mouse retina during vascular development, we showed that exogenous LRG1 reduces pericyte coverage and NG2 expression. It leads to diminished collagen IV sheathing, fewer adhesion and gap junctions, and reduced vessel calibre and vascular density. Moreover, in mouse retinae containing exogenous LRG1, the developing blood-retinal barrier remains more permeable with significantly higher numbers of transcytotic vesicles present in microvascular endothelial cells. These results reveal that exogeneous LRG1 is sufficient to interfere with the maturation of developing retinal vessels and drive vessel development towards a dysfunctional phenotype. These observations deliver further evidence that LRG1 is an angiopathic factor and highlight the therapeutic potential of blocking LRG1 in diseases characterized by pathogenic angiogenesis or vascular remodelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoeh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: