In certain industrial applications, the control updating rate is faster than the output sampling rate by a certain factor, which leads to dual‐rate (DR) control problems. Generally speaking, a DR controller performs better than a slow single rate (SSR) controller but worse than a fast single rate (FSR) controller in the sense of minimum variance control. This conjecture is theoretically justified in this paper for a continuous linear time‐invariant (LTI) single‐input single‐output (SISO) system. The optimal FSR, DR and SSR controllers are designed under the same performance criterion: variance of the fast sampled output. The discretization of continuous stochastic disturbance models is investigated preserving certain basic statistical properties. A linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach is developed to calculate the optimal controllers for DR and SSR loops. The theoretical results are illustrated by two simulation examples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: