Key‐block approaches are widely used in the analysis of rock slopes. The key‐group method improves such analyses by taking into account groups of blocks instead of single blocks. Nevertheless, these stability analyses are usually carried out within a context where uncertainty may be a difficult problem to overcome. In the present paper, we propose introducing probabilistic approaches into the key‐group method in order to account for uncertainty in the mechanical parameters of the problem to be solved. Both the first‐order, second‐moment method (FOSM) and the advanced second‐moment method (ASMM) are considered herein and compared with Monte‐Carlo simulations through the use of five theoretical case studies. Lastly, the probabilistic key‐group method (PKGM) is qualified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bafghi et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: