This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
It has been recently argued that some machine learning techniques known as Kernel methods could be relevant for capturing cognitive and neural mechanisms (Jäkel, Schölkopf, & Wichmann, 2009). We point out that ''String kernels,'' initially designed for protein function prediction and spam detection, are virtually identical to one contending proposal for how the brain encodes orthographic information during reading. We suggest some reasons for this connection and we derive new ideas for visual word recognition that are successfully put to the test. We argue that the versatility and performance of String kernels makes a compelling case for their implementation in the brain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannagan et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: