This paper is devoted to the decomposition of an image f into u + v, with u a piecewise-smooth or "cartoon" component, and v an oscillatory component (texture or noise), in a variational approach. Meyer [Oscillating Patterns in Image Processing and Nonlinear Evolution Equations, Univ. Lecture Ser. 22, AMS, Providence, RI, 2001] proposed refinements of the total variation model (Rudin, Osher, and Fatemi [Phys. D, 60 (1992), pp. 259--268]) that better represent the oscillatory part v: the spaces of generalized functions G = div(L^∞) and F = div(BMO) (this last space arises in the study of Navier--Stokes equations; see Koch and Tataru [Adv. Math., 157 (2001), pp. 22--35]) have been proposed to model v, instead of the standard L 2 space, while keeping u a function of bounded variation. Mumford and Gidas [Quart. Appl. Math., 59 (2001), pp. 85--111] also show that natural images can be seen as samples of scale-invariant probability distributions that are supported on distributions only and not on sets of functions. However, there is no simple solution to obtain in practice such decompositions f = u + v when working with G or F. In earlier works [L. Vese and S. Osher, J. Sci. Comput., 19 (2003), pp. 553--572], [L. A. Vese and S. J. Osher, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 20 (2004), pp. 7--18], [S. Osher, A. Solé, and L. Vese, Multiscale Model. Simul., 1 (2003), pp. 349--370], the authors have proposed approximations to the (BV,G) decomposition model, where the L^∞ space has been substituted by L p , 1 ≤ p < ∞. In the present paper, we introduce energy minimization models to compute (BV,F) decompositions, and as a by-product we also introduce a simple model to realize the (BV,G) decomposition. In particular, we investigate several methods for the computation of the BMO norm of a function in practice. Theoretical, experimental results and comparisons to validate the proposed new methods are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: