The reactions of the title thionocarbonates (6, 7, and 8, respectively) with a series of secondary alicyclic amines are subjected to a kinetic investigation in 44 wt % ethanol-water, 25.0 degrees C, ionic strength 0.2 M (KCl). Under excess amine, pseudo-first-order rate coefficients (k(obsd)) are obtained for all reactions. Reactions of substrates 6 and 7 with piperidine and of thionocarbonate 8 with the same amine and piperazine, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine, and morpholine show linear k(obsd) vs [amine] plots, with slopes (k(1)) independent of pH. On the other hand, these plots are nonlinear upward for the reactions of substrates 6 and 7 with all the amines, except piperidine, and also for the reactions of compound 8 with 1-formylpiperazine and piperazinium ion. For all these reactions a mechanistic scheme is proposed with the formation of a zwitterionic tetrahedral intermediate (T(+/-)), which can transfer a proton to an amine to give an anionic intermediate (T(-)). Rate and equilibrium microcoefficients of this scheme, k(1), k(-)(1), K(1) (= k(1)/k(-)(1)), and k(2), are obtained by fitting the nonlinear plots through an equation derived from the scheme. The Brönsted-type plots for k(1) are linear with slopes beta(1) = 0.19, 0.21, and 0.26 for the aminolysis of 6, 7, and 8, respectively. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the formation of T(+/-) (k(1) step) is the rate-determining step. The k(1) values for these reactions follow the sequence 8 > 7 > 6, consistent with the sequence of the electron-withdrawing effects from the substituents on the "nonleaving" group of the substrates. The k(1) values for the aminolysis of 6, 7, and 8 are smaller than those for the same aminolysis of 3-methoxyphenyl, 3-chlorophenyl, and 4-cyanophenyl 4-nitrophenyl thionocarbonates (2, 3, and 4, respectively). The k(2) values (expulsion of the nucleofuge from T(+/-)) increase as the electron withdrawal from the nonleaving group increases. These values are smaller for the aminolysis of 6, 7, and 8 compared to those for the same aminolysis of 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castro et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: