Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Zirconium and titanium complexes with tridentate bis(phenolate)−donor (donor = pyridine, furan and thiophene) ligands have been prepared and investigated for applications in propylene polymerization. The ligand framework has two “X-type” phenolates connected to the flat heterocyclic “L-type” donor at the 2,6- or 2,5- positions via direct ring−ring (sp 2 −sp 2 ) linkages. The zirconium and titanium dibenzyl complexes have been prepared by treatment of the neutral bis(phenol)−donor ligands with M(CH 2 Ph) 4 (M = Ti, Zr) with loss of 2 equiv of toluene. Titanium complexes with bis(phenolate)pyridine and -furan ligands and zirconium complexes with bis(phenolate)pyridine and -thiophene ligands have been characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The solid-state structures of the bis(benzyl)titanium complexes are roughly C 2 -symmetric, while the zirconium derivatives display C s and C 1 symmetry. The bis(phenolate)pyridine titanium complexes are structurally affected by the size of the substituents (CMe 3 or CEt 3 ) ortho to the oxygens, the larger group leading to a larger C 2 distortion. Both titanium and zirconium dibenzyl complexes were found to be catalyst precursors for the polymerization of propylene upon activation with methylaluminoxane (MAO). The activities observed for the zirconium complexes are particularly notable, exceeding 10 6 g polypropylene/mol Zr·h in some cases. The bis(phenolate)pyridine titanium analogues are about 10 3 times less active, but generate polymers of higher molecular weight. When activated with MAO, the titanium bis(phenolate)furan and bis(phenolate)thiophene systems were found to promote propylene oligomerization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agapie et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: