Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong [Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2377 (1989)] suggested that a scheme of multiple phase measurements, using quantum states with minimum ``reciprocal peak likelihood,'' could achieve a phase sensitivity scaling as 1/Nₜₒₜ², where Nₜₒₜ is the mean number of photons available for all measurements. We have simulated their scheme for as many as 240 measurements and have found optimum phase sensitivities for 3{≤}Nₜₒₜ{≤}120; a power-law fit to the simulated data yields a phase sensitivity that scales as 1/Nₜₒₜ^0.82±0.01. By using a combination of numerical and analytical techniques, we extend our results to higher values of Nₜₒₜ than are accessible to our simulations; we find no evidence for phase sensitivities better than the benchmark 1/Nₜₒₜ sensitivity of squeezed-state interferometry. We conclude that reciprocal peak likelihood is not a good measure of phase sensitivity. We discuss other factors that are important to phase sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lane et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: