The diastereomerically and enantiomerically pure amido complex ( SR )-(η 5 -C 5 H 5 )Re(NO)(PPh 3 )(N̈HCH(CH 3 )Ph) (( SR )- 5 ) converts to ( RR )- 5 (inversion at rhenium, retention at carbon) in THF- d 8 at 49.4 °C with k 1 = 2.34 × 10 - 4 s - 1 and k - 1 = 0.90 × 10 - 4 s - 1 . Similarly, ( SS )- 5 converts to ( RS )- 5 with k 1 = 0.90 × 10 - 4 s - 1 and k - 1 = 2.30 × 10 - 4 s - 1 . Both epimerizations give equilibrium ratios ( RR / SR or SS / RS ) of 70:30. Reactions with HOTf yield [(η 5 -C 5 H 5 )Re(NO)(PPh 3 )(NH 2 CH(CH 3 )Ph)] + TfO -, and subsequent additions of Et 4 N + CN - afford (η 5 -C 5 H 5 )Re(NO)(PPh 3 )(CN) and NH 2 CH(CH 3 )Ph (all steps with retention at rhenium and carbon). Enantiomeric purities and absolute configurations are assayed by chiral NMR shift reagents and (−)-menthyl chloroformate derivatives, respectively, establishing configurations of epimerized 5 . Reaction of ( SR )- 5 and P( p -tol) 3 in THF- d 8 at 49.4 °C gives (η 5 -C 5 H 5 )Re(NO)(P( p -tol) 3 )(N̈HCH(CH 3 )Ph) (50:50 ( t 0 ) → 66:34 ( t ∞ ) RR / SR ) with k = 4.6 × 10 - 4 s - 1, twice that for the conversion of ( SR )- 5 to ( RR )- 5 . Rate data for the latter at 32.3−59.1 °C give Δ H ⧧ = 26 kcal/mol and Δ S ⧧ = 6 eu. These results are best modeled by mechanisms involving initial and rate determining PPh 3 dissociation, with anchimeric assistance by the amido lone pair, to give an intermediate that is trigonal planar at rhenium and combines with PAr 3 without significant diastereoselectivity. Reactions of n -BuLi with 5 and related complexes give N̈LiR species from which PPh 3 is lost at lower temperatures, and are presumed to be much less configurationally stable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewey et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: