Why the study?
LV summit VAs are often difficult to eliminate within the communicating vein because standard 8F RF ablation catheters cannot be advanced due to small vessel size and high impedance prevents sufficient power output.
Does radiofrequency ablation using a 5F ablation catheter eliminate ventricular arrhythmias originating from the left ventricular summit communicating vein?
Does radiofrequency ablation using a 5F ablation catheter eliminate ventricular arrhythmias originating from the left ventricular summit communicating vein?
A 5F ablation catheter may allow for successful radiofrequency ablation of ventricular arrhythmias within the small-sized left ventricular summit communicating vein where standard 8F catheters cannot reach.
RF ablation within summit-CV using 5F nonirrigated catheter eliminated LV summit VAs; leaves open optimal access and catheter choice.
Some idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originate from the left ventricular (LV) summit in the vicinity of the right and left ventricular outflow tracts.1–3 LV summit-VAs often have the earliest activation during the VAs in the LV summit communicating vein (summit-CV).4,5 Those LV summit-VAs have been reported to be successfully eliminated by radiofrequency (RF) ablation on the aortic cusps, LV endocardium, and right ventricular outflow tract.1,5–9 However, it often is difficult to eliminate LV summit-VAs by RF ablation targeting the earliest activation during the VAs within the summit-CV because commonly used 8F RF ablation catheters usually cannot be advanced into the summit-CV due to its small vessel size, and sufficient RF power output cannot be delivered due to high generator impedance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamura et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: